Crime consistent, like itself name indicates, in falsely reporting a crime before the authority.
Usually this crime It has two modalities: a) report or accuse before the authority , the Author or participant in a crime de action public to person who knows he is innocent or simulate the existence of material evidence against him; b) falsely claim, before the authority, that a crime has been committed action public or simulate traces of it, in order to induce to instruction a proceedings all with investigate.
The second figure does not leave any doubt, because it supposes in the agent la complaint a done criminal that he knows is non-existent.
As for the first figure, it seems undoubted that the complaint or accusation against a person does not constitute crime but in the /// that the complainant or accuser knows that the accused is innocent. On the other hand way, but complaint against a person would be false in all cases of absolution of her. There will be no false, then complaint if the acts of the accusation are true, even though, being the acts certain, it will not be proven culpability of the accused. In final, which configures this crime is malice in the accusation.