You handed over money, property or a signature to someone who deceived you; or you are accused of having deceived someone else in a deal that went wrong. In both cases the first thing decided is whether there was deceit the law punishes or a plain breach of contract, and everything else depends on that: the complaint, the defense and the chance of recovering the money.
Six fraud situations that come through this office, from both sides of the deceit.
A property, a vehicle, an investment or a business sold with false papers, promises or a fake identity. The first thing to establish is what the deceit consisted of and what evidence of it remains.
You can act on their behalf and file the complaint. The sooner the transaction is documented, the easier it is to follow the money.
Nonexistent suppliers, diverted transfers and altered documents. The criminal and civil paths are prepared together to recover what left the company.
Not every breach is a crime. If there was no deceit to obtain the handover, the matter is civil, and that is the first line of defense.
In ordinary fraud the action depends on the victim, so an agreement that returns what was handed over can close the case. It should be in writing and complete.
A service charged for and never performed, a title or a permit that never came. When deceit was the means of obtaining the payment, there is a case.
Four stages. The first carries the most weight, and is the one fewest people prepare.
The messages, receipts, transfers, contracts and witnesses. That decides whether there is a crime or just a debt, and which path to take.
For the victim, the criminal complaint joined with a civil claim, to recover the money within the same case. For the accused, the defense is laid out from the very first filing.
The prosecutor investigates; measures can be requested so that the money or assets don't disappear while the case is pending.
Many cases end with an agreed return of what was handed over. If there is no agreement, the trial decides the penalty and the compensation, and the judgment is enforced to collect.
None of this is required for the first conversation. First tell us how it happened.
Messages, emails and calls with the other person, with their dates, exactly as they are.
Transfers, deposits, receipts or checks: each handover of money and which account it went to.
The contract, the promise of sale, the promissory note or the papers they showed you to convince you.
Name, ID or tax number, phone numbers, accounts and any address you have.
Who was present at the conversation, the signing or the handover of the money.
The police report, the complaint or the summons, if they already exist, from either side.
With the person's name, the date and the amount we get started. Banks and platforms keep records of the transactions.
The three paths can be combined. Which goes first depends on where the money is and what evidence there is.
Fraud is not any deal that goes wrong. What the law punishes is getting someone to hand over money or property through deceit: a false name, a status one does not have, an altered document or a scheme to make someone believe what is not so. Without that deceit what remains is a breach, which is claimed through the civil courts. That difference decides the strategy on both sides: for the victim, it is what has to be proven; for the accused, it is the first thing argued.
And one fact changes the pace of the case: ordinary fraud is prosecuted only at the victim's request, so the case begins and continues on the strength of the victim's complaint, and a settlement that withdraws it can close it. Since August 3, 2026 the new Penal Code, Law 74-25, is in force and redefines offenses and penalties; since the law more favorable to the accused applies, in pending cases it is worth checking which one governs.
Before talking about a crime, the deceit has to be proven. Before talking about a debt, you have to know where the money is.